| AN EVER GROWING BAND OF BELIEVERS
September
1, 2004
To Whom It May Concern:
I am a former correction
officer who worked at Bedford Hills Correctional Facility,
for seven years, a maximum-security facility for women
located near New York City. I resigned my position and
took an early retirement as of October 21, 2003. In the
course of my employment, I have had the opportunity to
observe many people and come to recognize the criminal
element first hand. And while there are countless inmates
who I personally know are a danger to society and belong
in prison, there are also inmates, who in my opinion, the
system has solemnly failed in the serving of justice. Ms.
Laurie Kellogg, an inmate I became acquainted with at Bedford
Hills, stands out among them all.
After working with Ms. Kellogg
for several years, observing her various predicaments,
joys, misfortunes and challenges, I could not help but
come to know her very well. She strenuously denied her
involvement in the crime she was convicted for, and resolutely
pled her cause with class and poise. I was naturally quite
dubious at first but in time not only began to give careful
consideration to her assertions, but could not deny the
rationale and evidence she marshaled to make her argument.
And sustaining her defense was a quality of conduct and
attitude, which keenly distinguished her from the general
inmate population. She was in fact different -a key dynamic
that compelled me to listen to her in the first place.
Kellogg was a model prisoner with unimpeachable morals
and an extraordinary level of sheer integrity, uncommon
in society much less in prison. She ultimately won my unqualified
respect, heartfelt sympathy and perfect trust.
Ms. Kellogg is presently
at the mercy of a vast alliance of unscrupulous individuals,
who without compassion or conscience, carelessly abuse
a power that they have not merited by temperament or training,
and visit their cruelty upon whomever they choose. I know
because I personally worked with these people. She has
had to endure multiple injustices including severe verbal
intimidation, relentless emotional abuse, and filthy sexual
harassment. Notwithstanding, Laurie Kellogg is an asset
to the prison community and the furthest thing from a security
risk, I know that too, because I was there. Since my retirement,
she has been corresponding with my wife and I through the
mail as often as possible for the encouragement and hope
our concern for her situation brings.
I have invested considerable
time and energy reviewing hundreds of pages of critical
case documents including the court transcripts of Ms. Kellogg's
trial and an intimidating complex of related legal paper
work. I have also gone out of my way to confer with attorneys
and private investigators about this case, who basically
concur with my conclusion that Laurie Kellogg does not
belong in prison. Two of these seasoned professionals have
investigated Laurie's case pro bono and have gone as far
as to put their conclusions in writing. Let me say categorically,
that the net effect of my experience and investigation
is my thorough persuasion, in my heart, that this woman
is innocent of the crime for which she has been convicted
and has forfeited 13 years of her life serving a 25 years
to Life sentence.
Accordingly, I have been
able to rally a small coalition of supporters who are working
to win Ms. Kellogg a new trial where evidence not introduced
at her first proceeding can be brought on her behalf and
exonerate her. It is an uphill battle and any help you
can give to this effort is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Officer Andy De Mers
NYSDOCS
(Retired)

August
14, 2004
To Whom It May Concern,
I recently wrote a carefully
researched, sizeable story about Wrongful Criminal Convictions
for the April, 2004 issue of Word Magazine, a publication
for which I serve in an editorial capacity. While I was
aware of the problem prior to the story, the scope of the
crisis had eluded me. My investigation confirmed that Wrongful
Criminal Convictions are slowly eroding the bedrock of
our criminal justice system, and present a grave and glaring
challenge to those at its helm.
During the course of my research,
I became convinced that one of the inmates whose case I
profiled in depth, Ms. Laurie Kellogg, was in fact innocent
of the crime she has been convicted of. I was so deeply
moved by the inequity of what she has endured, that I have
put my reputation on the line and joined a small band of
supporters who are attempting to get Ms. Kellogg's conviction
overturned. The case was very high profile, dominating
local headlines and even inspiring ABC to produce a movie
about it, (Lies of the Heart, The Laurie Kellogg Story).
We have enlisted the support
of a post-conviction attorney, Ms. Mary Ann DeBari, who
reviewed the record along with a plethora of additional
legal documents, interviewed Laurie and is convinced of
her innocence. She maintains that Kellogg is a candidate
for a CPL 440.10, and that the evidence is out there to
win her a new trial via this motion. It is my understanding
that this lawyer was willing to undertake this exhausting
endeavor when she was stricken with cancer and found to
be allergic to the chemo. Still, she has written us a letter
of support and wants to do all she is able to.
Like many wrongful conviction
cases I have reviewed for this assignment, her lawyer (I
believe a public defender), had either never tried a murder
case or maybe just one before Laurie's. I have been told
that he admitted on the record, that he should not have
done some things he did and didn't do some things he should
have. In addition, testimony that should have been introduced
at trial and may have resulted in a different verdict never
was, (the basis for the 440.10).
Furthermore, a nationally
acclaimed investigator Mr. Gil Alba, (just named investigator
of the year by an association of his peers), who has consulted
on camera for many networks, has also interviewed Laurie
pro bono, and feels she should be released. Alba, a 28
year NYPD veteran, has, like DiBari, put his impressions
on paper too.
Mr.
Andy De Mers is a retired Correction Officer who worked
on Ms. Kellogg's cell block
some six years and while dubious at first, eventually came
to believe her claims. In fact, De Mers is so thoroughly
convinced of her innocence, that he is actually leading
the charge in the effort to prove it. Accordingly, I am
trying to cooperate with this small coalition of concerned
people to help bring much needed publicity to bear upon
this unthinkable nightmare, and attract a legal team with
the integrity and grit to take Ms. Kellogg's case down
to the bone - a difficult and daunting task.
From
my limited vantage point, it is bad enough for Laurie Kellogg
to ride out what overwhelmingly
appears to be an illegitimate conviction, produced by poor
investigative work and defective representation at the
trial level. But what may be the greater and more imposing
issue is that she was a disposable commodity and very convenient
scapegoat for an overburdened and possibly politicized
system that was willing to look the other way to franchise "drive-by-justice." And
if it can happen to her, as unlikely as it seems, it can
happen to us. I reviewed countless cases that eclipsed
both reason and decency while I researched this topic,
and sat transfixed as unbridled power flexed its muscle
to trump the rights of innocent Americans.
If you can support this effort
in any way, would like more information or a copy of the
story, feel free to call me on my cell phone (716) 316-1569.
Thank you very much.
Respectfully,
Rick Kern
Editor, Word Magazine
Buffalo Edition
Dear Mr. Kern,
RE: Wrongful Conviction:
Laurie Kellogg
Thank you for your conscientious
interest in the Laurie Kellogg case. Like you and many
others steeped in her case, I too believe that gross
injustice hurled Ms. Kellogg into prison after wrongfully
convicting her at trial. Indeed, it is becoming increasingly
apparent that:
1. systematic misconduct
by the prosecution tainted Ms. Kellogg's trial and pre-trial
proceedings;
2. multiple teen witnesses - testifying for the people - had motive and disposition
to lie;
3. an avalanche of negative publicity prejudiced the jury unfairly; and,
in addition,
4. trail counsel failed woefully to defend Ms. Kellogg against overzealous
and selective prosecution.
Taken together, all of
the above convey a malodorous stench in the people's
case against Laurie Kellogg. Justice demands more.
A compelling motion to
vacate the conviction pursuant to Article 440 of New
York's criminal procedure law (CPL 440.10) is sorely
needed. So too, is a qualified team.
I am amendable to assist
in that effort to the extent I am physically able.
Sincerely yours,
Mary Ann Di Bari, Attorney,
pro bono publico
|